Monday, March 29, 2010

An icy motion

This seems to be a fairly interesting proposal - although the government would immediately have to explain why it is not inconsistent to allow porn. (Thanks to this post, visits to this blog will skyrocket now)


  1. Related breaking news from across the pond:

    "Federal Election Commission filings show that the Republican National Committee in February spent about $1,946 at Voyeur West Hollywood, the Daily Caller first reported, describing the location as a 'bondage-themed nightclub featuring topless women dancers imitating lesbian sex.'" (

    ... because nothing says fiscal responsibility and moral authority like strippers in hangman's masks and ball gags.

    What would we do without them?

  2. as long as prostitution is legal the only real way to prop this is "cause it just ain't the real deal"